• Join

  •  

    Sierra Club Reaches Out to Hunters With New Website; Should We Support Them? - Lowcountry Hunting - Helping hunters to have successful Lowcountry hunting experience



    Sierra Club Reaches Out to Hunters With New Website; Should We Support Them?

    Posted by lowcountryhunting on April 18, 2008

    Carolyn Mansfield of the Sierra Club recently emailed me about a new website, SierraSportsmen.org, that her organization is launching to reach out to sportsmen in their conservation efforts. The question I have it, should we support them in this effort?

    While I am not going to tell my readers what to think, I will tell you what I have found in my research of the Sierra Club so that you may make up your own mind. I also will direct you to the Hog Blog where Phillip has written a great article on this as well as how hunters should use this opportunity if they choose to.

    As for the Sierra Club itself, it seems that there is currently a huge battle going on inside and outside of the organization over the use of hunting as a conservation tool. The groups official policy currently supports it.

    Sport Hunting and Fishing — Within both modified and natural ecosystems, the Sierra Club believes that acceptable management approaches include regulated periodic hunting and fishing when based on sufficient scientifically valid biological information and when consistent with all other management purposes and when necessary total protection of particular species or populations. Because national parks are set aside for the preservation of natural landscapes and wildlife, the Sierra Club is opposed to sport hunting in national parks and national monuments.

    This support for hunting is creating quite a bit of conflict among some of the old supporters as well as within the management. For instance, renowned eco terrorist, Sea Shepherd Conservation Society founder and Sierra Club board member Paul Watson quit two years ago over the group’s acceptance of hunting as a conservation tool, and particularly over their use of a writing contest “Why I Hunt” where the grand prize was an big game hunt.

    On one hand, getting rid of a eco terrorist and anti-hunting activist like Watson seems to be a huge step in the right direction for the Sierra Club if it truly wishes to represent hunters. And when you consider that the powerful conservation group has over 1 million members, it is definitely a huge gain for all sportsmen. However one has to ask why he had to quit when he should have never been in such a position to begin with.

    You can also see the battle over hunting as a conservation tool going on right now in the Sierra Club’s Florida chapter where the entire board was just terminated and the entire chapter suspended. The club says that this was to end the infighting amongst the state group over the state chapter’s refusal to go along with the Sierra Club’s partnership with Clorox. But I have found other articles that refer to the state chapter advocating and adopting a vegan lifestyle while completely refusing to support hunting as a conservation tool which created a huge rift between the state board, its members and the national board even before this deal with Clorox.

    Again, this looks like a positive step in the right direction for sportsmen. However you can still find plenty of current instances where the Sierra Club, and even more often its state chapters, still has a knee-jerk reaction to prohibiting hunting to control animal populations. And this is definitely the case with cougar hunting out West; You can find plenty of info on this here at the Oregon state chapter as well as here at the California state chapter.

    And while the Sierra Club claims to be for hunting as a conservation tool, it says that it takes no position on the 2nd Amendment and the individual right to bear arms. This stance seems to ignore the fact that if that right is removed, hunters will NOT be able to provide their very necessary conservation efforts. You can also find a list of the candidates that they currently support here, and I doubt that many sportsmen will find it to their liking.

    There is a ton of information on all of this if any concerned sportsman is willing to just follow the links, and I encourage everyone to do so. For instance you can also read all about the current group of candidates that are running for the Sierra Club’s board of directors here as well as their positions on many important environmental issue. It is in these details that many hunters will find their answers to the question of whether to support the Sierra Club’s outreach to them.

    And while I will not be signing up as a member just yet, I do think that I will at least enroll in their newsletters so that I can follow these issues at the Sierra Club as well as at Sierra Sportsmen Network so that I can make an educated decision about whether to support them in the future.

    I will also be submitting some images to the photo contest that they are running that, as their new Sierra Sportsmen Network site says, “captures your passion and respect for the people, places, and critters we love to share our outdoor experiences with”. This contest will be judged by some very important and influential members of our outdoor community who are obviously looking to help build a bridge between sportsmen and “conservationists”.

    Like I said, check out the Hog Blog for more perspective on this very important issue. In addition, I would love to hear everyone’s thoughts on this, so feel free to leave detailed comments.

    Jeff

    If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

    10 Responses to “Sierra Club Reaches Out to Hunters With New Website; Should We Support Them?”

    1. Fishing » Blog Archive » Sierra Club Reaches Out to Hunters With New Website; Should We … Says:

      [...] Wilhelm2451 wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptSport Hunting and Fishing — Within both modified and natural ecosystems, the Sierra Club believes that acceptable management approaches include regulated periodic hunting and fishing when based on sufficient scientifically valid … [...]

    2. Arthur Says:

      I won’t retype it again, but you can see my response to this issue over at the Hog Blog.

      I definitely think it that it is a promising move by Sierra Club, but I am still skeptical at best.

      Great post though Jeff. Very informative.

    3. Matt Says:

      Great post Jeff. Years ago, I began to notice that Field & Stream was quietly advocating for partnerships between sportsmen and environmentalists. I have always thought this was a good idea and that we, as hunters and anglers, should be the thoughtful ones and reach out to the Sierra Club types.

      Still, I’m not sure if the Sierra Club’s statement has won me over. Management is a big part of hunting, but it’s also about food and fun. I’m also pretty sure I fish some places where the practice has not been proven to be a necessary management tool.

      I’ll check out Phillip’s piece.

    4. Phillip Says:

      Hey Jeff, thanks for the links, and for your take on the issue.

      I’m still really ambivalent here. While I believe firmly in what I wrote over on the Hog Blog, that it’s an opportunity for sportsmen to get involved and help define the future direction of the Sierra Club, there’s still definitely an uphill battle… especially when it comes to the political support of candidates who have not shown much respect for gun rights.

      I’ve also been doing a lot of digging since this press release came in, rolling through old news clippings, press releases, and “action alerts” from the Sierra Club regarding hunting issues. There’s a very clear distinction I’ve found in all of this research between hunting as a “management tool” which the Club claims to support, and sport or “trophy” hunting, which they don’t… hence the Sierra Club’s consistent support of bans on hunting predators, even when the science showed no negative impact of sport hunting on these species. That’s a tough one to chew on, even for someone like me who doesn’t hunt predators.

      Whatever the outcome of any decisions regarding Sierra Sportsmen or the Sierra Club, I do believe that it’s critical for hunters and fishermen to get actively involved in conservation and environmental organizations…even if it means breaking lockstep with the NRA and other conservative organizations.

    5. kristine shreve Says:

      I’m pretty much in the ambivalent category too. If they mean what they’re saying, this could be a nice opportunity. For now, I think I’ll just watch and see if their actions back up their words.

    6. Kris Says:

      I think I am with the rest on this one…I will have to wait and see what happens. It certainly sends mixed signals to say that they are supporting hunters, but take no stand on the 2nd amendment. It is also problematic to see that they are supporting candidates that could be detrimental to those rights.

    7. Sierra Club Wants To Be Pro-Hunting | The Complete Hunting Reference Says:

      [...] There are other fine articles about the new agenda of the Sierra Club written by fellow outdoor bloggers. Phillip at the Hog Blog wrote An Unlikely Ally Appears – or An Old Friend Returns? and Jeff from theLow Country Hunting blog wrote Sierra Club Reaches Out to Hunters with new Website; Should we Support Them? [...]

    8. winkes Says:

      [...] [...]

    9. garment news daily Says:

      Awesome website…

      [...]the time to read or visit the content or sites we have linked to below the[...]……

    10. reverse phone call lookup Says:

      reverse phone call lookup I like the helpful info you provide in your articles. I will bookmark your blog and check again here regularly. I’m quite sure I will learn a lot of new stuff right here! Best of luck for the next! Best Regards Shane…

      I like the helpful info you provide in your articles. I will bookmark your blog and check again here regularly. I’m quite sure I will learn a lot of new stuff right here! Best of luck for the next! Best Regards Shane…

    Leave a Reply

    XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>