<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WARNING: Bill H.4736 Would Replace SCDNR Board with Cabinet Position</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lowcountryhunting.com/2008/03/03/warning-bill-h4736-would-replace-scdnr-board-with-cabinet-position/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lowcountryhunting.com/2008/03/03/warning-bill-h4736-would-replace-scdnr-board-with-cabinet-position/</link>
	<description>Helping hunters to have successful Lowcountry hunting experience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:11:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lowcountryhunting</title>
		<link>http://lowcountryhunting.com/2008/03/03/warning-bill-h4736-would-replace-scdnr-board-with-cabinet-position/comment-page-1/#comment-911</link>
		<dc:creator>lowcountryhunting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 17:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowcountryhunting.com/2008/03/03/warning-bill-h4736-would-replace-scdnr-board-with-cabinet-position/#comment-911</guid>
		<description>Thanks everyone for your input on this very important subject... I will try to keep us updated on where this bill goes.

Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks everyone for your input on this very important subject&#8230; I will try to keep us updated on where this bill goes.</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://lowcountryhunting.com/2008/03/03/warning-bill-h4736-would-replace-scdnr-board-with-cabinet-position/comment-page-1/#comment-907</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 01:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowcountryhunting.com/2008/03/03/warning-bill-h4736-would-replace-scdnr-board-with-cabinet-position/#comment-907</guid>
		<description>This doesn&#039;t sound like a very smart thing to do. I agree that keeping the current system is the way to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This doesn&#8217;t sound like a very smart thing to do. I agree that keeping the current system is the way to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robley T Moore</title>
		<link>http://lowcountryhunting.com/2008/03/03/warning-bill-h4736-would-replace-scdnr-board-with-cabinet-position/comment-page-1/#comment-906</link>
		<dc:creator>Robley T Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 20:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowcountryhunting.com/2008/03/03/warning-bill-h4736-would-replace-scdnr-board-with-cabinet-position/#comment-906</guid>
		<description>I firmly oppose changing the current system for DNR oversight. This information needs to be put out to everyone in the state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I firmly oppose changing the current system for DNR oversight. This information needs to be put out to everyone in the state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip</title>
		<link>http://lowcountryhunting.com/2008/03/03/warning-bill-h4736-would-replace-scdnr-board-with-cabinet-position/comment-page-1/#comment-905</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 17:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowcountryhunting.com/2008/03/03/warning-bill-h4736-would-replace-scdnr-board-with-cabinet-position/#comment-905</guid>
		<description>Good lord, don&#039;t let &#039;em do it!  All you need to do is look at the behavior of the California Fish and Game Commission to see what this kind of appointed commission can do to the sport and the heritage!  

Fish and wildlife decisions should be made by experts in the field with a focus on good conservation and management... NOT on the political whims of the current Governor or party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good lord, don&#8217;t let &#8216;em do it!  All you need to do is look at the behavior of the California Fish and Game Commission to see what this kind of appointed commission can do to the sport and the heritage!  </p>
<p>Fish and wildlife decisions should be made by experts in the field with a focus on good conservation and management&#8230; NOT on the political whims of the current Governor or party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://lowcountryhunting.com/2008/03/03/warning-bill-h4736-would-replace-scdnr-board-with-cabinet-position/comment-page-1/#comment-900</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 01:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowcountryhunting.com/2008/03/03/warning-bill-h4736-would-replace-scdnr-board-with-cabinet-position/#comment-900</guid>
		<description>Buford Mabry Attorney for SCDNR Wants to Title Boats when they are Uncertain of Ownership

Bill would make boat titles easier

COLUMBIA &#124; A House subcommittee Tuesday agreed to a bill aimed at modernizing the stateâ€™s archaic boat title laws and making them easier for individuals and dealers.

The same panel delayed action on a bill barring exports of wild-caught turtles from the state.

The boating bill has been under study for seven years, said Department of Natural Resources attorney Buford Mabry. 

``This is long overdue,â€™â€™ he said.

Almost all boats in the state are required to have a title, just as a vehicle is. Canoes and kayaks are exempt, as are paddle boats with no motors.

Getting a title is not a problem when buying a new boat, but it often is when individuals sell one, or the dealer sells a used one before the title paperwork is complete, or if the old title canâ€™t be found.

In the case of used boats sold by dealers or individuals, ``We give temporary use permits so people can use a boat until they get the title,â€™â€™ something that has not been available, Mabry said.

Without the title, the new owner canâ€™t use the boat.

http://www.myrtlebeachonline.com/news/breaking_news/story/371725.html

***************************************************************************

A bill aimed at easing the tangle of red tape needed to register a boat that has been inactive or is of uncertain ownership will be up for a hearing Tuesday by a subcommittee of the House Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee.

State Rep. Billy Witherspoon, R-Conway, sponsored the bill. He said it has been in the works for five years to solve situations such as the inheritance of a boat. It&#039;s hard to get new titles for them, he said.

The proposal requires people to publish a legal ad seeking comment on the boat, and if there is none, it can receive a new title, Witherspoon said.

He said a possible side effect could be cleanup of the state&#039;s waterways littered with abandoned boats. No one wants them because it would be impossible to get the title, he said.

Under the proposal, a boat that still has life in it could be claimed by anyone who wants it.

The bill includes other provisions of boating law, but does not call for any fee increases, Witherspoon said.

http://www.myrtlebeachonline.com/politics/story/369042.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buford Mabry Attorney for SCDNR Wants to Title Boats when they are Uncertain of Ownership</p>
<p>Bill would make boat titles easier</p>
<p>COLUMBIA | A House subcommittee Tuesday agreed to a bill aimed at modernizing the stateâ€™s archaic boat title laws and making them easier for individuals and dealers.</p>
<p>The same panel delayed action on a bill barring exports of wild-caught turtles from the state.</p>
<p>The boating bill has been under study for seven years, said Department of Natural Resources attorney Buford Mabry. </p>
<p>&#8220;This is long overdue,â€™â€™ he said.</p>
<p>Almost all boats in the state are required to have a title, just as a vehicle is. Canoes and kayaks are exempt, as are paddle boats with no motors.</p>
<p>Getting a title is not a problem when buying a new boat, but it often is when individuals sell one, or the dealer sells a used one before the title paperwork is complete, or if the old title canâ€™t be found.</p>
<p>In the case of used boats sold by dealers or individuals, &#8220;We give temporary use permits so people can use a boat until they get the title,â€™â€™ something that has not been available, Mabry said.</p>
<p>Without the title, the new owner canâ€™t use the boat.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.myrtlebeachonline.com/news/breaking_news/story/371725.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.myrtlebeachonline.com/news/breaking_news/story/371725.html</a></p>
<p>***************************************************************************</p>
<p>A bill aimed at easing the tangle of red tape needed to register a boat that has been inactive or is of uncertain ownership will be up for a hearing Tuesday by a subcommittee of the House Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee.</p>
<p>State Rep. Billy Witherspoon, R-Conway, sponsored the bill. He said it has been in the works for five years to solve situations such as the inheritance of a boat. It&#8217;s hard to get new titles for them, he said.</p>
<p>The proposal requires people to publish a legal ad seeking comment on the boat, and if there is none, it can receive a new title, Witherspoon said.</p>
<p>He said a possible side effect could be cleanup of the state&#8217;s waterways littered with abandoned boats. No one wants them because it would be impossible to get the title, he said.</p>
<p>Under the proposal, a boat that still has life in it could be claimed by anyone who wants it.</p>
<p>The bill includes other provisions of boating law, but does not call for any fee increases, Witherspoon said.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.myrtlebeachonline.com/politics/story/369042.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.myrtlebeachonline.com/politics/story/369042.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake's Outdoors &#187; Tuesday&#8217;s Tracking: Lowcountry Hunting</title>
		<link>http://lowcountryhunting.com/2008/03/03/warning-bill-h4736-would-replace-scdnr-board-with-cabinet-position/comment-page-1/#comment-898</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake's Outdoors &#187; Tuesday&#8217;s Tracking: Lowcountry Hunting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 16:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowcountryhunting.com/2008/03/03/warning-bill-h4736-would-replace-scdnr-board-with-cabinet-position/#comment-898</guid>
		<description>[...] the issues that affect hunting, especially in South Carolina.Â  Today, he has a blog posted about legislation that would removeÂ  the DNR Board, instead replacing it with a secretary appointed by the governor.Â  You can go over to his page and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the issues that affect hunting, especially in South Carolina.Â  Today, he has a blog posted about legislation that would removeÂ  the DNR Board, instead replacing it with a secretary appointed by the governor.Â  You can go over to his page and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur</title>
		<link>http://lowcountryhunting.com/2008/03/03/warning-bill-h4736-would-replace-scdnr-board-with-cabinet-position/comment-page-1/#comment-897</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 13:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowcountryhunting.com/2008/03/03/warning-bill-h4736-would-replace-scdnr-board-with-cabinet-position/#comment-897</guid>
		<description>From what I am reading here I think that keeping the current system would definitely be the way to go.  Taking away any link between the DNR and the constituents is just not a very good idea, and having the possibility for this person to change every 4 years is another bad idea.

Fight the good fight Jeff and I will let my family members in the area know about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I am reading here I think that keeping the current system would definitely be the way to go.  Taking away any link between the DNR and the constituents is just not a very good idea, and having the possibility for this person to change every 4 years is another bad idea.</p>
<p>Fight the good fight Jeff and I will let my family members in the area know about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
